Appearance
Korean Copyedit Review Report
Review metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Review type | GitBook Markdown copyedit batch |
| Model | openai.gpt-6.1-sol via Amazon Bedrock Mantle |
| Scope | 693 Korean Markdown pages; final diff covers 578 files |
| Iteration | 1 |
| Scale | 90 points; visual testing is exempt for Markdown |
| Score | 90 / 90 |
| Verdict | PASS |
Quality gate
| Category | Critical | Warning | Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markdown structure and links | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Technical terminology and meaning | 0 | 0 | 32 rejected suggestions, reverted before final review |
| Language and readability | 0 | 0 | 10 grammar/spacing corrections applied during the second pass |
| Sensitive data and factual additions | 0 | 0 | No new technical claims or values were introduced |
| Total open findings | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Review evidence
GPT-6.1-Sol inspected 693 Korean Markdown files. It proposed 2,184 edits; 60 were excluded by validation guards for multiline replacements, numeric changes, inline-code changes, ambiguous source matches, or unchanged text. A second pass reviewed all 2,124 accepted edits for shifts in technical meaning. Thirty-two risky edits were reverted, and ten awkward grammar or spacing results were corrected. Including the separately validated emphasis repairs and publication-scope correction below, the final diff changes 578 files with 2,112 insertions and 2,112 deletions.
The edit validator preserved URLs, Markdown link destinations, inline code, numeric values, table delimiters, and list markers. git diff --check passes. This review covers the copyedit diff; it does not re-audit technical claims that were already present in the source pages.
The original pages were used as the source comparison. No sections were intentionally removed. A supplementary VitePress Markdown parser scan identified 121 regions in 83 documents where bold markers appeared as text. Repairs in 82 documents changed only delimiter placement, and two escaped markers in one quiz were corrected against the English source. The complete post-repair scan of 693 Korean pages found zero literal bold-marker regions. Fenced code bytes and languages, links, heading counts, fence counts and explicit anchors remain identical to the original source. Browser screenshot testing is exempt for this Markdown artifact; actual parser rendering and Vue compilation are covered by regression tests. All 174 repository tests pass.
The LLM guide's publication-language statement was separately updated after integration with main commit f5bcc9b4: current VitePress configuration publishes all five locales, and catalog/MCP indexing remains Korean/English. This repository-configuration correction is separately verified against the current build configuration, rather than attributed to the model's copyedit verdict.
Next steps
PASS — the Korean copyedit diff is ready for PR review.